Prediction of Cheong-Eui Kim vs Mark Whitehouse Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Kim vs M. Whitehouse

Cheong-Eui Kim
KOR
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
35
Age
32
-
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
894
296
Best Rank
523
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Mark Whitehouse
GBR
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
35
Age
32
-
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
894
296
Best Rank
523
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Kim 1 - 0 Whitehouse
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cheong-Eui Kim winning 2 and Mark Whitehouse winning 0. The last match between Cheong-Eui Kim and Mark Whitehouse was at the M15 Kashiwa, 04-04-2019, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Cheong-Eui Kim getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kim | 1 |
| Whitehouse | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Kashiwa(04-04-19)
Cheong-Eui Kim
6
6
Mark Whitehouse
2
3
C. Kim vs M. Whitehouse H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.34% (375-279) | Career Total W/L | 50.37% (202-199) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 13 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Kim vs M. Whitehouse Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cheong-Eui Kim has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mark Whitehouse has won 48.90%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cheong-Eui Kim, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mark Whitehouse has won 45.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cheong-Eui Kim has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mark Whitehouse has saved 55.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cheong-Eui Kim has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mark Whitehouse winning 50.00% (W/L 8/8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cheong-Eui Kim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 73/53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/6). Mark Whitehouse has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 124/115), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 19/22).
- Player level: In the last year, Cheong-Eui Kim has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mark Whitehouse has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 7/5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cheong-Eui Kim winning 1 times and Mark Whitehouse being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cheong-Eui Kim winning 2 and Mark Whitehouse winning 0.
- The last match between Cheong-Eui Kim and Mark Whitehouse was at the M15 Kashiwa, 04-04-2019, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Cheong-Eui Kim getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cheong-Eui Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mark Whitehouse has played against players with an average rank of 270.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cheong-Eui Kim has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mark Whitehouse has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cheong-Eui Kim has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mark Whitehouse has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cheong-Eui Kim vs Mark Whitehouse Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Kim vs M. Whitehouse H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 1:16:0 | Average Match Time | 1:16:0 |
| 75% (44/59) | 1st Serve % | 79% (46/58) |
| 66% (29/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (24/46) |
| 60% (9/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (5/12) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 50% (29/58) | Return Points Win % | 36% (21/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kim 0%, Whitehouse 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kim 0%, Whitehouse 47%.
Break Points Saved %: Kim 0%, Whitehouse 53%.
C. Kim Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
F | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
SF | W | 7-5 6-1 | ||
M. Whitehouse Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||

C. Kim vs M. Whitehouse Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.34% (375/279) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.37% (202/199) |
| 55.80% (832/659) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.65% (466/454) |
| 52.91% (7377/6566) | Games Win/Loss | 50.60% (4457/4351) |
| 57.81% (285/208) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.88% (124/115) |
| 57.94% (73/53) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.34% (19/22) |
| 48.57% (17/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.44% (44/45) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 46.88% (15/17) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 1048 | Aces Total | 1557 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 649 | Total Double Faults | 767 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:9:19 |
| 529.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 450.53 |
| 65% (14445/22253) | 1st Serve % | 65% (13640/21052) |
| 68% (9794/14445) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9333/13640) |
| 50% (3899/7808) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3513/7412) |
| 45% (1123/2510) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (814/1984) |
| 42% (9571/22577) | Return Points Win % | 39% (8078/20892) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 41.01% (57/82) | Challenger W/L | 41.03% (16/23) |
| 61.87% (318/196) | Futures W/L | 51.67% (186/174) |
| 57% (363/642) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (201/398) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (75/163) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (58/123) |
| 52% (98/189) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (58/121) |
| 86% (355/307) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (210/171) |
| 13% (355/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (210/37) |
| 22% (299/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (191/31) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
02:05 PM 15/11/25
Prediction10:30 PM 15/11/25
Prediction11:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction11:10 PM 15/11/25
Prediction04:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction09:40 PM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Jannik Sinner vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Zverev Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Shelton H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
12:35
H2H 0-0
14:05
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal